- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 12:19:07 -0400
- To: "Patel-Schneider, Peter" <Peter.Patel-Schneider@nuance.com>
- Cc: "public-rdf-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Patel-Schneider, Peter <Peter.Patel-Schneider@nuance.com> wrote: > Hi Mark: > > It is quite strange to finally respond to your message from 9 years ago [1], > but the RDF recommendations had remained unchanged for a number of years, > and the current RDF WG is finally getting around to addressing remaining > comments on the public-rdf-comments mailing list. > > You commented that the 2004 version of the media type application/rdf+xml [2] > does not say that the use of this media type requires assertion of the > triples encoded in the document, although there was previous discussion on > this point. Do you still believe that something should be done to address > this issue? Hey Peter. Wow, a blast from the past. But no, I no longer hold that opinion; I now believe assertion is inherent in the act of publication. Mark.
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2013 16:19:34 UTC