- From: Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:09:16 -0700
- To: "public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <BCA92D8B-832C-4128-BB33-44E5895D7100@syapse.com>
Sorry, I am failing to be brief ... On Jul 19, 2013, at 9:35 AM, Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com> wrote: > [[[ > > rdfs:Graph > > rdfs:Graph is the class of graphs. All instances of rdfs:Graph correspond to the RDF model of a graph described in the RDF Concepts specification [RDF-CONCEPTS]. > An instance of rdfs:Graph MAY also be described in an RDF dataset, in which case the triples in the graph SHOULD/MUST be the triples as specified in the dataset. > > ]]] > > > (I would be happy with either SHOULD or MUST) looking again, MUST is too strong - since this would allow anyone to modify anyone's else's intent. We need to qualify which RDF datasets and reduce the MUST down to SHOULD. e.g. "MAY also be described in a related RDF dataset, ….. SHOULD …." with the complete modified suggested text as [[[ rdfs:Graph rdfs:Graph is the class of graphs. All instances of rdfs:Graph correspond to the RDF model of a graph described in the RDF Concepts specification [RDF-CONCEPTS]. An instance of rdfs:Graph MAY also be described in a related RDF dataset, in which case the triples in the graph SHOULD be the triples as specified in the dataset. ]]]
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 18:09:47 UTC