Re: Turtle tests blank ID patches, and EARL report for Serd

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On 26 February 2013 05:30, Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:13 PM, David Robillard <d@drobilla.net>
wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Issue: There are tests-ttl tests that do not match the current grammar
> >> [2], e.g. turtle-syntax-prefix-02.ttl contains "PreFIX :
> >> <http://example/>", but the grammar only allows PREFIX.
> >
> >
> >
> > The grammar no longer specifies all of the case rules in Turtle,
> > specifically Note #1 of the Grammar section
> > (
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#sec-grammar-grammar
):
> >
> > Keywords in single quotes ('@base', '@prefix', 'a', 'true', 'false') are
> > case-sensitive. Keywords in double quotes ("BASE", "PREFIX") are
> > case-insensitive.
>
> David Wood mentioned that the group was still considering whether to
> make @base and @prefix case-insensitive.


Mmm... that is news to me. I do know that the whole BASE, PREFIX addition
is a feature at risk.

>
>
> > This is a editoral change from the LC document
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-turtle-20120710/#sec-grammar-grammar see
change
> > set https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/rev/d3e8ccd67c9c  and the thread
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Dec/0074.html
>
> You referred to that as a LC document. Did you mean "Last Call"? That
> document looked to be a Working Draft, per its title, and it appeared
> as though there was no Last Call for Turtle [1] (hence the flood of
> enquiries now!).


There was! Really!
http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2012/07/13/rdf-working-group-publishes-turtle-as-last-call-working-draft/

Document maturity level: Working Draft.

Documents don't claim in their left hand header to be Last Call :\ In the
"Status of This Document" section you'll find:

"This is a Last Call Working Draft and thus the Working Group has
determined that this document has satisfied the relevant technical
requirements and is sufficiently stable to advance through the Technical
Recommendation process"

>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call