Re: Update EARL rollup for CR Turtle

On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 17:14 -0500, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> An updated rollup EARL report [1] is available, that shows 100% conformance for two processors, Jena RIOT [2] and Ruby rdf-turtle [3]. This this is enough to show interoperability, we would like to include reports for more processors; please send any EARL reports to <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>.

This test suite does not seem to cover dots or escapes (other than
percent, for which there is a test) in prefixed names (?)  I hope this
information isn't going to be used to claim 100% conformance to the
draft if it doesn't cover such fundamental changes...

Also, re: first.nt and last.nt, my existing test framework uses byte
level file comparison to check correctness, this makes it simple to
ensure absolute byte by byte correctness without depending on RDF aware
code (which itself could be in error).  These outputs use human tailored
blank names like "_:outerEl1" and "_:innerEl1" which makes the test
fail.  Could they be changed to IDs an implementation could be expected
to produce, e.g. "_:el1" and "_:el2"?

Thanks,

-dr