W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > February 2013

Re: node-n3: Turtle implementation in JavaScript

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:45:44 -0800
Message-Id: <504FE121-2464-443F-A841-7F5604C0045B@greggkellogg.com>
Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, "public-rdf-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
To: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:41 PM, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 22 February 2013 16:31, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 6:53 PM, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 22 February 2013 12:45, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote:
>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>> 
>>>>> You may want to test against the new tests also [6], as the tests at
>>>>> [7] do not test all of the features in the Candidate Recommendation.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for the pointer!
>>>> Do the new ones obsolete the old tests or should I test both?
>>> 
>>> It can't hurt to test against both if you want to have backwards
>>> compatibility with existing Turtle documents. However, there are no
>>> references to either test suite in the current Candidate
>>> Recommendation so it is not completely clear what to do at this stage.
>>> For what it is worth, the original submission tests are also in the
>>> mercurial repository at [8].
>> 
>> The two test manifests to run to show compliance with the CR Turtle spec are at [1] and [2]. If you provide EARL reports for either or both of these, they will be included in the compliance report.
>> 
>> EARL reports should also include project DOAP information including the following:
>> 
>> doap:name, doap:developer, doap:homepage, doap:description and doap:programming-language.
>> 
>> Additionally, for the developer, foaf:name and foaf:homepage.
>> 
>> An example of a previous run of the consolodated EARL report (just for the base tests) at [3].
>> 
>> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/tests-ttl/manifest.ttl
>> [2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/coverage/tests/manifest.ttl
>> [3] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/reports/index.html
> 
> Thanks Gregg,
> 
> Could you link to those in the specification, or in a linked document,
> before the recommendation is finalised if possible.

That was missed in the version that was released, I'll make sure an issue is created to track it.

Gregg

> Cheers,
> 
> Peter
Received on Friday, 22 February 2013 06:46:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:31 UTC