- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:06:17 -0800
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, <w3c-archive@w3.org>
Looks good. Congratulations on getting the spec this far. -Annette On Dec 11, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: > Dear Annette, > > Thank you for your review of the JSON-LD specifications and your support to publish them as W3C Recommendations. You suggested a number of editorial changes [1] to improve the "JSON-LD 1.0" specification. I'm happy to inform you that they have just been implemented in the latest editor's draft which is available at > > http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/ > > There's also a diff available at [2]. > > Thanks again, > Markus > > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Dec/0007.html > [2] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/00be0c60d3ac469c0f5540b3def70a44e28e47e7 > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: WBS Mailer on behalf of amgreiner@lbl.gov >> [mailto:webmaster@w3.org] >> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 12:18 AM >> To: public-rdf-comments@w3.org; w3c-archive@w3.org >> Subject: [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 >> Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' >> >> The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Call for >> Review: >> JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed >> Recommendations' (Advisory Committee) for Lawrence Berkeley National >> Laboratory by Annette Greiner. >> >> Regarding the "JSON-LD 1.0" specification, the reviewer suggests >> changes, >> but supports publication as a W3C Recommendation whether or not the >> changes >> are adopted. >> >> >> Additional comments about the specification: >> I suggest some small copyediting changes. >> Section 6.14 should read "information about *two* secret agents" and >> "it is >> necessary *to* assign agent 1 an identifier." >> Section 6.16's description of the indexing example refers to a ja >> term, which does not appear in the example itself. >> The text needs consistent use of a and an before terms >> beginning with @ (either always use an, or use an only before >> terms starting with a vowel). >> Section 9 contains a redundant parenthetical explanation, "language- >> tagged >> strings (language-tagged strings)". >> >> >> Regarding the "JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API" >> specification, >> the reviewer supports publication as a W3C Recommendation as is. >> >> Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at >> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/JSON-LD-PRs/ until 2013-12-05. >> >> Regards, >> >> The Automatic WBS Mailer >> > > -- Annette Greiner Outreach, Software, and Programming Group NERSC, LBNL amgreiner@lbl.gov 510-495-2935
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2013 21:06:49 UTC