- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:27:44 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, RDF WG Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Hi Sandro, This is an official response to RDF-ISSUE-130: Properly referencing the DOM Futures spec, which is being tracked here: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/130 You were concerned that the way we refer to the WHATWG DOM4 Futures specification from the JSON-LD API specification may not be acceptable for a W3C Recommendation. You did some digging (thank you!) and outlined a plan that would take us into CR and to REC: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013May/0260.html The JSON-LD group agrees with and supports your findings and has updated the reference to the spec here: http://json-ld.org/spec/CR/json-ld-api/20130822/#bib-DOM-WHATWG Since you are the person that proposed the plan, we are assuming that this resolves RDF-ISSUE-130. Just to make certain there are no other issues, please respond to this email as soon as you can to verify that your concerns related to RDF-ISSUE-130 have been addressed. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Meritora - Web payments commercial launch http://blog.meritora.com/launch/
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 18:28:06 UTC