- From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 14:40:19 -0700
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 8/11/13 2:03 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > * Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> [2013-08-11 12:34-0700] >> On 8/9/13 11:56 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: >>> Please re-submit implementations reports for Turtle so you can >>> 1. Help us push Turtle to final Recommendation status. >>> 2. Raise public awareness of your implementation. >>> The tests are listed in a manifest.ttl file at >>> <http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/> >> >> ... >> >> Several of the tests in this suite seem to be based on N-Triples with >> Unicode; which is probably the language defined in >> >> N-Triples - A line-based syntax for an RDF graph >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-n-triples-20130409/ >> W3C Working Group Note >> >> This is a different language to N-Triples the W3C Recommendation >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-testcases-20040210/#ntriples >> >> So to pass this test suite you have to implement two new languages. >> >> You might want to either fix that (use REC N-Triples) or add that >> information to the http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/README > > I thought I *had* fixed that. Specifically, I thought the expected > graphs were written in the 2004 NTriples language (after a few fixes > from Dave Robillard). Can you point out something we missed? $ grep . *nt | perl -n -e 'print if /[\x80-\xff]/' localName_with_non_leading_extras.nt:<http://a.example/a·̀ͯ‿.⁀> <http://a.example/p> <http://a.example/o> . Dave
Received on Sunday, 11 August 2013 21:40:42 UTC