- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 17:03:46 -0400
- To: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
* Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> [2013-08-11 12:34-0700] > On 8/9/13 11:56 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > Please re-submit implementations reports for Turtle so you can > > 1. Help us push Turtle to final Recommendation status. > > 2. Raise public awareness of your implementation. > > The tests are listed in a manifest.ttl file at > > <http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/> > > ... > > Several of the tests in this suite seem to be based on N-Triples with > Unicode; which is probably the language defined in > > N-Triples - A line-based syntax for an RDF graph > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-n-triples-20130409/ > W3C Working Group Note > > This is a different language to N-Triples the W3C Recommendation > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-testcases-20040210/#ntriples > > So to pass this test suite you have to implement two new languages. > > You might want to either fix that (use REC N-Triples) or add that > information to the http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/README I thought I *had* fixed that. Specifically, I thought the expected graphs were written in the 2004 NTriples language (after a few fixes from Dave Robillard). Can you point out something we missed? > Dave > -- -ericP
Received on Sunday, 11 August 2013 21:04:17 UTC