Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine

On 18/04/13 00:23, Peter Ansell wrote:
> Making it easier to write SPARQL Update queries (by allowing Turtle
> @base and @prefix inside of the query graph pattern for instance,
> which would be enormously valuable!) is something that should have
> been done by the SPARQL working group, not by the RDF/Turtle working
> group.

You can have BASE, PREFIX on each operation in SPARQL Update, not just 
at the beginning of the file.

> Why did the SPARQL working group syntax become static so early if
> this was an immediately known issue for the RDF/Turtle working group
> back in 2011, given that SPARQL-1.1 has only *just* gone through
> recommendation in 2013?

LOL

Why did no one comment?

The SPARQL/Update submission was July 2008.

SPARQL 1.1 Update drafts were published from Oct 2009.

 Andy

Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 09:06:48 UTC