- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:05:42 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>, public-rdf-comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Hi Ivan & Gavin, Thanks. I'm happy to add another nail to RDF/XML's coffin anyway. :) For the record: I am satisfied with this resolution. Thanks! David On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 17:52 +0200, Ivan Herman wrote: > Note that RDFa has the same feature. In the case of RDFa, the request > came (a fairly long time ago, actually) from, eg, IPTC[1] that has > internal data structures that denote individual items by numbers. This > is the same with, say, geonames URI-s, if my memory serves me well, > but also in a number of library cataloguing services. In all those > cases the 'natural' prefix:localname' structure would lead to a > numeric-only local name. > > Ivan > > [1] http://www.iptc.org/site/Home/ > On Jun 28, 2012, at 17:48 , Gavin Carothers wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:41 AM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: > >> I notice that the Turtle grammar now permits a local name to begin with > >> a digit, such as foo:1234 or _:5678 . > >> http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/#term-turtle2-PN_LOCAL > >> As far as I remember, this is a divergence from RDF/XML, because XML > >> local names are not permitted to start with a digit. When I check the > >> RDF WG list of resolutions I see no mention of this change, so > >> > >> I am wondering about the rationale for this change, but I see no mention > >> of it in the RDF WG list of resolutions: > >> http://demo.3roundstones.net/rdf/2012/rdfwg/resolutions.xhtml?view > >> > >> Was this divergence discussed? And if so, can someone please supply a > >> pointer to the rationale? > > > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/1 > > > > Part of the alignment of Turtle with SPARQL 1.0 and SPARQL 1.1, both > > of which allow for local names that start with digits. The RDF data > > model has always allowed for any IRI to be used, this in fact meant > > that there is valid RDF that cannot be expressed in RDF/XML. > > > > Thank you for your comment. I hope that clears up your question. > > > > Cheers, > > Gavin > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > >> -- > >> David Booth, Ph.D. > >> http://dbooth.org/ > >> > >> Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily > >> reflect those of his employer. > >> > >> > > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > > > > -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 17:06:19 UTC