- From: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:55:57 +0200
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Public-Rdb2rdf-Wg RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <7C89F30D-5D4D-48D4-98C1-E447BE41D185@fi.upm.es>
Hi Ivan I'll be working on this task (apologies for the delay). I was using this tool [1] for converting the file to RDFa … I'm not sure if that tools supports RDFa 1.1 Ivan, do you know a RDF2RFa tool RDFa 1.1 compliant? Apologies if the question is so trivial. Thanks! Boris [1] http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/rdf2rdfa/ On Jul 30, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Ivan Herman wrote: > Indeed, you need Ivan to deploy those, and he is back from holidays:-) > > I have uploaded the new versions. > > Boris, at some point, we may want to think of converting the r2rml file to RDFa 1.1, now that it is a Rec. I can do it at some point if you want, just not now; I still have to reduce my pile of emails after the vacations... > > Ivan > > On Jul 25, 2012, at 23:55 , Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: > >> Yes, Richard you are right, Ivan needs to deploy those, when he is back from holidays. >> >> On Jul 25, 2012, at 8:03 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: >> >>> Boris, Ivan, >>> >>> I guess that Ivan needs to deploy those? >>> >>> Best, >>> Richard >>> >>> >>> On 17 Jul 2012, at 00:11, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ivan, Richard >>>> >>>> You can find at [1] a zip file containing >>>> - the html file describing the vocab. >>>> - the ttl file that contains the vocab in Turtle format >>>> - the rdf file that contains the vocab in RDF/XML format >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Boris >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/vocab/r2rml.zip >>>> >>>> On Jul 13, 2012, at 7:43 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Boris, >>>>> >>>>> A few changes are needed in the R2RML namespace document. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.w3.org/ns/r2rml >>>>> >>>>> The vocabulary has a property rr:refObjectMap which doesn't exist in the language any more. >>>>> >>>>> The range of rr:objectMap should be the union of rr:ObjectMap and rr:RefObjectMap. >>>>> >>>>> The new class rr:TermMap needs to be added. It is a superclass of rr:SubjectMap, rr:PredicateMap, rr:ObjectMap and rr:GraphMap. Suggested additional triples: >>>>> >>>>> rr:TermMap rdfs:label "Term Map"@en. >>>>> rr:TermMap rdfs:comment "A function that generates an RDF term from a logical table row."@en. >>>>> >>>>> I think the current RDFS document can be simplified a bit by using rr:TermMap in a few places where currently the union of the four subclasses is used. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks and all the best, >>>>> Richard >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > >
Received on Sunday, 16 September 2012 22:56:24 UTC