- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:23:38 -0400
- To: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: Public-Rdb2rdf-Wg RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
* Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es> [2012-03-13 18:24+0100]
> Hi Eric
>
> - Here is an example of the earl-compliant test report [1]
tiny nit: comment text in 2nd example is inconsistent with the assertion:
... earl:outcome earl:fail # passed (vs. earl:fail)
could just get rid of the comment.
> - As you suggested, in order to generate the html test report, we need to map each test case to an r2rml feature, something like this [2], we should do the same for the DM.
<rdb2rdf-test:R2RMLTC0000>
rdb2rdf-test:relatedFeature r2rml:tableName .
these make sense, but note that it's likely that any test is likely to
cover several features, e.g. r2rml:template and rdb2rdf:nonAsciiName
> - regarding your previous email, I should add the base IRI for the TCs in the direct graphs, so we can parse those as nt., is it ok?
I'd rather just rename them all to .ttl . Does that seem acceptable?
> Thanks
>
> Boris
>
> [1] http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/tc/testreport.ttl
> [2] http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/tc/r2rmlfeatures.ttl
--
-ericP
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2012 03:24:08 UTC