Re: Detailed review of R2RML test cases, parts 0000-0006

Hi Richard, all

I've propagated Richard suggestions to the rest of the TCs, also I created a new corner cases as well.
The repository [1] and ED [2] are updated now.

Next steps
- Assign URLs to the features we have identified, i.e, columns of the R2RML TC coverage matrix [3], right Eric?
- Define the EARL based description of the Test Report
- Implement the TH software that will generate the Test Report for the R2RML implementations, as described in [4]

In paralell
- keep reviewing the current R2RML TCs, e.g., I still need to remove/modify some BNodes TCs.
- do the same for the DM, does anyone is reviewing the DM TCs?

Thanks again Richard

Boris


[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdb2rdf-tests/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/
[3] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_TC
[4] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Submitting_Test_Results#Phase_3._Download_the_Test_Harness_software

On Mar 12, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> 
> On 12 Mar 2012, at 01:03, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote:
>> On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:59 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>>> 3. As said in the call, the base IRI is an additional input into the mapping process, besides the database. It is *not* the value of @base in the mapping file.
>> 
>> As far as I remember we decided to include the base IRI in the beginning of the document, right?. I think this base IRI will be the same for the DM, right? Eric? Juan? 
> 
> I guess you could say something like:
> 
> [[
> Throughout all test cases, we use the base IRI <http://example.com/>:
> 
> • to turn relative IRIs generated by the Direct Mapping into absolute IRIs,
> • as the required “<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/#dfn-base-iri">base IRI</a>” input to the R2RML processor.
> ]]
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Boris
>> 
>> 
> 
>