- From: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:41:46 +0200
- To: Nuno Lopes <nuno.lopes@deri.org>
- Cc: "public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org WG" <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <EC289CBA-6D7E-47B2-A5B5-B02EE1B419D5@fi.upm.es>
Hi Nuno Thank you for running the tests. Regarding D009-2tables1primarykey1foreignkey/r2rmld.ttl You can see in the example (from the spec) http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#example-r2rml-view It is not necessary to add the rr:datatype xsd:integer Regarding D011-M2MRelations/r2rmla.ttl According to http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#typed-literals "The implicit SQL datatype of a datatypeable term map is CHARACTER VARYING if the term map is a template-valued term map; otherwise, it is the SQL datatype of the respective column in the logical table row." So, I think the TCs are ok thanks Boris On Jun 1, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > Hello Boris, > > Thanks for the great work. > > When running the testcases I found what seems to be the old syntax in some of the direct mapping tests. The diff file is attached, can you check these? > > > Also, in 'D009-2tables1primarykey1foreignkey/r2rmld.ttl' and 'D011-M2MRelations/r2rmla.ttl' shouldn't the object maps > > rr:objectMap [ rr:column "SPORTCOUNT"; ]; > and > rr:objectMap [ rr:column "ID"; ] > > include the 'rr:datatype xsd:integer' datatype specification? In the mapping file they are as integers but without the respective datatype shouldn't they be literals? > > Cheers, > -- > Nuno Lopes > > <testcases2.diff> > On 29 May 2012, at 02:00, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> - the TCs document [1] and repos [2] are updated according to the new specs. >> - the R2RML TC coverage matrix is updated [3] (I included a column for the default mappings new R2RML feature). >> - There is a new version of the TH software [4], I also updated the "submitting results" wiki page [5] . >> - [6] is an example of the earl test report generated for a given implementation. Implementors should send us this earl test report file. This is explained in [5]. >> >> I would like to update the DM coverage Matrix [7], one of the things I need is to know where is the last official document DM spec. >> Eric, Juan, Marcelo would you please point me out the url of the DM spec? >> >> TIA >> >> Boris >> >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/ >> [2] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdb2rdf-tests/ >> [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_TC >> [4] http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/tc/th/rdb2rdf-th_bin_0.0.4.zip >> [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Submitting_Test_Results >> [6] http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/tc/th/earl-morph-dm.ttl >> [7] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/DM_TC >
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 12:44:41 UTC