Re: negative test case question

Let me clarify

The following mapping is correct:

<TriplesMap1>
    a rr:TriplesMap;
    rr:logicalTable [ rr:tableName "Employees" ];
 rr:subjectMap [ rr:column "FirstName"; rr:termType rr:BlankNode ];
rr:predicateObjectMap
    [
      rr:predicate foaf:name;
      rr:objectMap    [ rr:column "FirstName" ]
    ]
    .

The following mapping should fail:

<TriplesMap1>
    a rr:TriplesMap;
    rr:logicalTable [ rr:tableName "Employees" ];
rr:subjectMap [ rr:column "FirstName" ];
 rr:predicateObjectMap
    [
      rr:predicate foaf:name;
      rr:objectMap    [ rr:column "FirstName" ]
    ]
    .

right?


Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com


On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>wrote:

> Juan,
>
> On 9 Feb 2012, at 23:51, Juan Sequeda wrote:
> > I'm coming up with r2rml mappings that should fail.
> >
> > The following is correct:
> >
> > <TriplesMap1>
> >     a rr:TriplesMap;
> >     rr:logicalTable [ rr:tableName "Employees" ];
> >       rr:subjectMap [ rr:column "FirstName"; rr:termType rr:BlankNode ];
> >       rr:predicateObjectMap
> >     [
> >       rr:predicate foaf:name;
> >       rr:objectMap    [ rr:column "FirstName" ]
> >     ]
> >     .
> >
> >
> > If I take the rr:TermType rr:BlankNode, that should fail, right?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean, if you add “rr:termType
> rr:BlankNode” to the object map, then it should fail?
>
> Why do you think so?
>
> Richard