Re: Q: ISSUE-41 bNode semantics

I guess you haven't realised that doing personal attacks rather than scientific discussions doesn't lead anywhere -- or at least from my point of view.
cheers
--e.

On 20 May 2011, at 12:03, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> Classy!
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
>> From: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
>> Date: 19 May 2011 21:02:39 GMT+01:00
>> To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
>> Subject: Re: Q: ISSUE-41 bNode semantics
>> 
>> I'm not answering to you anymore, sorry.
>> --e.
>> 
>> On 19 May 2011, at 21:43, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>> 
>>>>> But did you read the RDF Semantics document?
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/
>>>> 
>>>> I don't see a smiley here, so I take that you are serious in asking. I guess I already replied to this very specific question <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011May/0113.html>.
>>> 
>>> I just read that message again and didn't see an answer to this very specific question, Enrico: Did you read the RDF Semantics document?

Received on Friday, 20 May 2011 13:13:19 UTC