Re: Q: ISSUE-41 bNode semantics

> I believe this is what Juan tried to explain in his first email [1]. He
> got it right from the beginning but people kept speaking about producing
> an explicit triple :-)
Oh :( ... sorry about that.

Follow up questions:

1) In the Direct Mapping are there cases where join tables would be
automatically collapsed and therefore the triple that hints at the presence
of NULL columns would be missing?

2) What are the practical considerations of querying for a missing triple vs
querying for an explicit NULL value in a triple?


Received on Thursday, 19 May 2011 12:48:36 UTC