- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 15:56:32 +0200
- To: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
- Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
* David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com> [2011-05-18 08:37-0500] > > I'm all for applying Okkam's razor here. Let's not try to boil the ocean > > for now but create a solution that 1. solves the problem at hand, and 2. > > doesn't bite us in the back when we want to go for a future version of > > SPARQL or a newer version of SQL, FWIW. > > > > I agree with that and I am on board with having R2RML 1.0 drop the triples > with NULLs and allow users to do something different via a SQLQuery. +1 > -David -- -ericP
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 13:57:03 UTC