- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:32:40 -0800
- To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- CC: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Let's ask the Direct Mapping editors what they think of this plan? Eric, Juan, Marcelo? All the best, Ashok On 2/16/2011 10:28 AM, Alexandre Bertails wrote: > All, > > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 10:09 -0800, ashok malhotra wrote: >> Minutes from Feb 15 Telcon are available at http://www.w3.org/2011/02/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html > During the last call, we decided to publish very quickly the snapshots > of both the R2RML and Direct Mapping specifications. Some people were > reluctant because not that much happened in the Direct Mapping > document [1]. > > I actually worked a lot recently on the denotational RDF semantics. I > have a version available at [2] (extracted from LaTeX). I also worked > a lot on the "no-hierarchy" branch [3] of the FeDeRate repository so > that the code reflects perfectly the maths. It's already taking into > account the [[ simplest approach ]] [4] we discussed about the > hierarchy table. > > With the approval of the Working Group and of the editors, I'll be > happy to contribute this work to the Working Draft so that the > community can react on a far better specification. These are > significant improvements that will have to be included anyway. > > I can do the work *this week* with the help of Eric, who has already > reviewed my work. So this can be part of the snapshot we agreed to > publish. > > Alexandre Bertails. > > [0] http://www.w3.org/2011/02/15-rdb2rdf-irc.html#T18-01-25 > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/02/16-DM-denotational-rdf-semantics > [2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FeDeRate/rev/0407570a9826 > [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/02/15-rdb2rdf-irc.html#T17-54-13 > >> Request to attendees: when you join, please indicate your presence by entering in IRC: >> present+: YourName >> >> This will get your name in the minutes. > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2011 19:35:51 UTC