Re: D2R's many-to-many definition

>>
>> Discuss open issues: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/open
>
> This list doesn't appear to give me the issues listed in the Direct
> Mapping, e.g. the many-to-many issue.
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/#many-to-many-as-repeated-properties
>
> Is there another list?

The rest is in postponed or review status, see:


  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/postponed

  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/pendingreview


based on earlier WG decisions. I guess it makes sense to first work  
through the open issues, though and make sure to assign actions for  
each ;)


Cheers,
	Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

On 26 Apr 2011, at 14:57, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:

> * ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> [2011-04-25 05:13-0700]
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> AGENDA Teleconference
>> W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2011-04-26
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> *16:00-17:00 UTC*
>> Local time:
>> http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=04&day=19&year=2011&hour=16&min=00&sec=0
>>
>> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
>> Conference code: 7322733# (spells "RDB2RDF")
>> IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Chair: Ashok
>>
>> 1. Assignment of scribe
>>
>>
>> 2  Accept the minutes of last meeting http://www.w3.org/2011/04/19-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
>>
>>
>> 3. Do we need a f2f meeting?  Should it be at TPAC2011
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/11/TPAC/
>>
>> Continue discussion from last week
>>
>>
>> 4. Issue review
>>
>> Last week we decided the following:
>> + ISSUE-18 -> ACTION-119
>> + ISSUE-19 postponed, blocked on ISSUE-18
>> + ISSUE-25 -> ACTION-120
>> + ISSUE-29 -> ACTION-121
>>
>> There is mail from David McNeil asking for conformation if issue 25  
>> can be closed.
>> There is also mail from David re. issues 19 and 29.  Notes added to  
>> the issue description.
>>
>> Discuss open actions: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/open
>>
>> Discuss open issues: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/open
>
> This list doesn't appear to give me the issues listed in the Direct
> Mapping, e.g. the many-to-many issue.
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/#many-to-many-as-repeated-properties
>
> Is there another list?
>
>
>
> Persuant to the many-to-many (Q's for Richard and others):
>  What is the exact definition of a many-to-many table?
>
>  Does D2R include many-to-many behavior in it's default behavior?
>
>  Does the many-to-many representation preclude the representation
>  as a first class relation?
>
>
>
>> 5. AOB
>> -- 
>> All the best, Ashok
>>
>
> -- 
> -ericP
>

Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 14:13:13 UTC