W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2011

D2R's many-to-many definition

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:57:35 -0400
To: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110426135734.GC7394@w3.org>
* ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> [2011-04-25 05:13-0700]
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> AGENDA Teleconference
> W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2011-04-26
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> *16:00-17:00 UTC*
> Local time:
> http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=04&day=19&year=2011&hour=16&min=00&sec=0
> 
> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
> Conference code: 7322733# (spells "RDB2RDF")
> IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Chair: Ashok
> 
> 1. Assignment of scribe
> 
> 
> 2  Accept the minutes of last meeting http://www.w3.org/2011/04/19-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
> 
> 
> 3. Do we need a f2f meeting?  Should it be at TPAC2011
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/11/TPAC/
> 
> Continue discussion from last week
> 
> 
> 4. Issue review
> 
> Last week we decided the following:
> + ISSUE-18 -> ACTION-119
>  + ISSUE-19 postponed, blocked on ISSUE-18
>  + ISSUE-25 -> ACTION-120
>  + ISSUE-29 -> ACTION-121
> 
> There is mail from David McNeil asking for conformation if issue 25 can be closed.
> There is also mail from David re. issues 19 and 29.  Notes added to the issue description.
> 
> Discuss open actions: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/open
> 
> Discuss open issues: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/open

This list doesn't appear to give me the issues listed in the Direct
Mapping, e.g. the many-to-many issue.

  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/#many-to-many-as-repeated-properties

Is there another list?



Persuant to the many-to-many (Q's for Richard and others):
  What is the exact definition of a many-to-many table?

  Does D2R include many-to-many behavior in it's default behavior?

  Does the many-to-many representation preclude the representation
  as a first class relation?



> 5. AOB
> -- 
> All the best, Ashok
> 

-- 
-ericP
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 13:57:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:23 UTC