- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:57:35 -0400
- To: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
* ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> [2011-04-25 05:13-0700] > --------------------------------------------------------- > AGENDA Teleconference > W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2011-04-26 > ---------------------------------------------------------- > *16:00-17:00 UTC* > Local time: > http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=04&day=19&year=2011&hour=16&min=00&sec=0 > > Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) > Conference code: 7322733# (spells "RDB2RDF") > IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Chair: Ashok > > 1. Assignment of scribe > > > 2 Accept the minutes of last meeting http://www.w3.org/2011/04/19-rdb2rdf-minutes.html > > > 3. Do we need a f2f meeting? Should it be at TPAC2011 > > http://www.w3.org/2011/11/TPAC/ > > Continue discussion from last week > > > 4. Issue review > > Last week we decided the following: > + ISSUE-18 -> ACTION-119 > + ISSUE-19 postponed, blocked on ISSUE-18 > + ISSUE-25 -> ACTION-120 > + ISSUE-29 -> ACTION-121 > > There is mail from David McNeil asking for conformation if issue 25 can be closed. > There is also mail from David re. issues 19 and 29. Notes added to the issue description. > > Discuss open actions: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/open > > Discuss open issues: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/open This list doesn't appear to give me the issues listed in the Direct Mapping, e.g. the many-to-many issue. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/#many-to-many-as-repeated-properties Is there another list? Persuant to the many-to-many (Q's for Richard and others): What is the exact definition of a many-to-many table? Does D2R include many-to-many behavior in it's default behavior? Does the many-to-many representation preclude the representation as a first class relation? > 5. AOB > -- > All the best, Ashok > -- -ericP
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 13:57:56 UTC