- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:10:16 +0100
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
On 14 Sep 2010, at 15:47, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >> However, if we wish to continue the time-honored Semantic Web >> tradition of >> having catchy names, we could call the language SQRL (squirrel) > > I think it's clever, but even though it ends in "RL" rather than > "QL", it makes my mind assume it's a query language... which it's not. > > Similarly, I'd (for better or for worse) expect R2RML to be an XML > language, so I wouldn't like that name if we don't go with an XML > syntax. The obvious way of addressing this complaint would be ... SQRM -- SQL to RDF Mapping. Not sure I like it ;-) Richard > > And no, I don't have a suggestion of my own :( > > Lee > >> >> Anyways, food for thought. I'm happy with either name, or *any* >> name for >> that matter. >> >> cheers, >> harry >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 16:10:55 UTC