Re: done with the document -- just figures need to be updated

> I think captions and diagrams being minorly off are OK, but we should fix
> that ASAP in the editor's draft and in the next version of R2RML.

Just for clarification:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/FPWD-rdb2rdf-r2rml/

... is the frozen version used for FPWD; there nothing should be changed,
however, feel free to continue working on:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/

Cheers,
      Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:01:44 +0100 (BST)
> To: Souri Das <Souripriya.Das@oracle.com>
> Cc: <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>,
> RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: done with the document -- just figures need to be updated
> 
>> Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote:
>>> Hi Souri,all
>>> 
>>> I updated the figures according to version 1.25, you can find them at:
>>> 
>>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/TriplesMap.png
>>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/ForeignKey.png
>>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/RDFTermMap.png
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I have a question, I'm not sure how exactly represent this
>>> rr:tableGraphIRI rdfs:range <Set of valid IRI references> .
>>> 
>>> it is included in the figure
>>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/TriplesMap.png
>>> 
>> That looked fine for rr:tableGraphIRI.
>> 
>> We needed the same thing for the new property, rr:columnGraphIRI.
>> Noticed that it is not included in the latest RDFTermMap diagram (Fig 1)
>> in the R2RML FPWD.
>> 
>> Also, realized that the captions of Fig 1, 3, and 4 are not fully
>> accurate (because these are not RDF graphs, rather a way of showing
>> domains and ranges).
>> 
>> But, it is too late and also I am ok with these minor
>> omissions/inaccuracies because the text has the complete information any
>> way.
>> 
> 
> I think captions and diagrams being minorly off are OK, but we should fix
> that ASAP in the editor's draft and in the next version of R2RML.
> 
> 
>> Thanks,
>> - Souri.
>>> Would you pls check it and let me know if it is ok?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Boris
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 27/10/2010 7:50, Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
>>>> Souri,
>>>> 
>>>> Great to learn things worked out, thanks a lot! However, I'm confused
>>>> re the figures - Boris said he has done it and Richard uploaded them.
>>>> 
>>>> Can you please check and confirm we are good to go ASAP?
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>              Michael
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 18:04:41 UTC