- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:57:55 +0100
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Harry,
> Just send me a quick e-mail when it's done and I'll send in the
> publication request.
The FPWD is available at [1] - please start the pub request.
I fixed all but the following issues [2] (which is IMHO fine and shouldn't
keep us from hitting the button):
Namespaces Checker
=================
Complains that following URIs 404:
* http://www.w3.org/ns/r2rml# - pinged Ivan to ask to fix it (any chance
this can be fixed within the next, say, hour, Ivan? :)
* http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/ - obvious, this has to be created by admins
(note that TLR has approved the shortname per 2010-10-26)
* http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-r2rml-20101027/ - obvious as well, this has
to be created by admins
Compound Documents
==================
Complains about these four links (though, they are all in the directory
provided [1]):
* RDFTermMap.png
* RDFTermMapSubClasses.png
* TriplesMap.png
* ForeignKey.png
Cheers,
Michael
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/FPWD-rdb2rdf-r2rml/
[2]
http://www.w3.org/2005/08/online_xslt/xslt?xmlfile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2
Fservices%2Ftidy%3FpassThroughXHTML%3D1%26docAddr%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.w
3.org%252F2001%252Fsw%252Frdb2rdf%252Fr2rml%252FFPWD-rdb2rdf-r2rml%252F&xslf
ile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F08%2Fonline_xslt%2Fxslt%3Fxmlfile%3Dhtt
p%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F07%2Fpubrules%253Fuimode%253Dchecker_full%2526
year%253D2010%2526docstatus%253Dfpwd-wd-tr%2526rectrack%253Dyes%2526prevrec%
253Dnone%2526patpol%253Dw3c%2526normative%253Dyes%2526uri%253Dhttp%25253A%25
252F%25252Fwww.w3.org%25252F2001%25252Fsw%25252Frdb2rdf%25252Fr2rml%25252FFP
WD-rdb2rdf-r2rml%25252F%2526filterValues%253Dform%2526nscheckmanual%253D%252
6display%253Dsummary%2526recursive%253Doff%2526recurse_auth%253Don%26xslfile
%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F09%2Fchecker%2Fframe.xsl%26display%3Dsum
mary%26recurse_auth%3Don&uimode=checker_full&filterValues=form&year=2010&doc
status=fpwd-wd-tr&rectrack=yes&prevrec=none&patpol=w3c&normative=yes&doc_uri
=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2001%2Fsw%2Frdb2rdf%2Fr2rml%2FFPWD-rdb2rdf-r2rml%
2F&recursive=off&nscheckmanual=&display=summary&recurse_auth=on
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html
> From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:53:30 +0100 (BST)
> To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
> Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>,
> RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>, <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
> Subject: Re: done with the document -- just figures need to be updated
>
>>
>>> Michael - no, the new images are not in CVS. Can you bing them in and
>>> re-run pubrules, and then I'll write-up the publication request?
>>
>> Sure, that's why I'm asking. Now I know everything I need to know. I'll
>> freeze the doc now and date it (after updating the images).
>
> Just send me a quick e-mail when it's done and I'll send in the
> publication request.
>
>>
>>> (Sorry, doing about 3 publication requests today, and your a more
>>> knowledageble chair than the other two!)
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Michael
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas
>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>> Ireland, Europe
>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
>>> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:14:55 +0100 (BST)
>>> To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
>>> Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Souripriya Das
>>> <souripriya.das@oracle.com>,
>>> RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>, <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
>>> Subject: Re: done with the document -- just figures need to be updated
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> It looks fine to me. You could have also done it with data-types, but
>>>>> otherwise it seems clear.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given that we have to publish this before 12 ET time today, I think
>>>>> unless
>>>>> there's any objections, we do the publication request. I'll wait 2
>>>>> more
>>>>> hours just in case.
>>>>
>>>> Hang on a sec Harry - do you mean the new images are already in the W3C
>>>> CVS?
>>>>
>>>> Can I run pubrules on it now or do you take care of it?
>>>
>>> Michael - no, the new images are not in CVS. Can you bing them in and
>>> re-run pubrules, and then I'll write-up the publication request?
>>>
>>> (Sorry, doing about 3 publication requests today, and your a more
>>> knowledageble chair than the other two!)
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas
>>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:12:18 +0100 (BST)
>>>>> To: <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
>>>>> Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Souripriya Das
>>>>> <souripriya.das@oracle.com>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: done with the document -- just figures need to be updated
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Souri,all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I updated the figures according to version 1.25, you can find them
>>>>>> at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/TriplesMap.png
>>>>>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/ForeignKey.png
>>>>>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/RDFTermMap.png
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a question, I'm not sure how exactly represent this
>>>>>> rr:tableGraphIRI rdfs:range <Set of valid IRI references> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it is included in the figure
>>>>>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/TriplesMap.png
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would you pls check it and let me know if it is ok?
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks fine to me. You could have also done it with data-types, but
>>>>> otherwise it seems clear.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given that we have to publish this before 12 ET time today, I think
>>>>> unless
>>>>> there's any objections, we do the publication request. I'll wait 2
>>>>> more
>>>>> hours just in case.
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> harry
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Boris
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27/10/2010 7:50, Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
>>>>>>> Souri,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great to learn things worked out, thanks a lot! However, I'm
>>>>>>> confused
>>>>>>> re
>>>>>>> the figures - Boris said he has done it and Richard uploaded them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you please check and confirm we are good to go ASAP?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 12:58:39 UTC