- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:57:55 +0100
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Harry, > Just send me a quick e-mail when it's done and I'll send in the > publication request. The FPWD is available at [1] - please start the pub request. I fixed all but the following issues [2] (which is IMHO fine and shouldn't keep us from hitting the button): Namespaces Checker ================= Complains that following URIs 404: * http://www.w3.org/ns/r2rml# - pinged Ivan to ask to fix it (any chance this can be fixed within the next, say, hour, Ivan? :) * http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/ - obvious, this has to be created by admins (note that TLR has approved the shortname per 2010-10-26) * http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-r2rml-20101027/ - obvious as well, this has to be created by admins Compound Documents ================== Complains about these four links (though, they are all in the directory provided [1]): * RDFTermMap.png * RDFTermMapSubClasses.png * TriplesMap.png * ForeignKey.png Cheers, Michael [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/FPWD-rdb2rdf-r2rml/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/08/online_xslt/xslt?xmlfile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2 Fservices%2Ftidy%3FpassThroughXHTML%3D1%26docAddr%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.w 3.org%252F2001%252Fsw%252Frdb2rdf%252Fr2rml%252FFPWD-rdb2rdf-r2rml%252F&xslf ile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F08%2Fonline_xslt%2Fxslt%3Fxmlfile%3Dhtt p%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F07%2Fpubrules%253Fuimode%253Dchecker_full%2526 year%253D2010%2526docstatus%253Dfpwd-wd-tr%2526rectrack%253Dyes%2526prevrec% 253Dnone%2526patpol%253Dw3c%2526normative%253Dyes%2526uri%253Dhttp%25253A%25 252F%25252Fwww.w3.org%25252F2001%25252Fsw%25252Frdb2rdf%25252Fr2rml%25252FFP WD-rdb2rdf-r2rml%25252F%2526filterValues%253Dform%2526nscheckmanual%253D%252 6display%253Dsummary%2526recursive%253Doff%2526recurse_auth%253Don%26xslfile %3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F09%2Fchecker%2Fframe.xsl%26display%3Dsum mary%26recurse_auth%3Don&uimode=checker_full&filterValues=form&year=2010&doc status=fpwd-wd-tr&rectrack=yes&prevrec=none&patpol=w3c&normative=yes&doc_uri =http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2001%2Fsw%2Frdb2rdf%2Fr2rml%2FFPWD-rdb2rdf-r2rml% 2F&recursive=off&nscheckmanual=&display=summary&recurse_auth=on -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html > From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> > Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:53:30 +0100 (BST) > To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> > Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>, > RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>, <bvillazon@fi.upm.es> > Subject: Re: done with the document -- just figures need to be updated > >> >>> Michael - no, the new images are not in CVS. Can you bing them in and >>> re-run pubrules, and then I'll write-up the publication request? >> >> Sure, that's why I'm asking. Now I know everything I need to know. I'll >> freeze the doc now and date it (after updating the images). > > Just send me a quick e-mail when it's done and I'll send in the > publication request. > >> >>> (Sorry, doing about 3 publication requests today, and your a more >>> knowledageble chair than the other two!) >> >> LOL! >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> -- >> Dr. Michael Hausenblas >> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >> Ireland, Europe >> Tel. +353 91 495730 >> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >> http://sw-app.org/about.html >> >> >> >>> From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> >>> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:14:55 +0100 (BST) >>> To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> >>> Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Souripriya Das >>> <souripriya.das@oracle.com>, >>> RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>, <bvillazon@fi.upm.es> >>> Subject: Re: done with the document -- just figures need to be updated >>> >>>> >>>>> It looks fine to me. You could have also done it with data-types, but >>>>> otherwise it seems clear. >>>>> >>>>> Given that we have to publish this before 12 ET time today, I think >>>>> unless >>>>> there's any objections, we do the publication request. I'll wait 2 >>>>> more >>>>> hours just in case. >>>> >>>> Hang on a sec Harry - do you mean the new images are already in the W3C >>>> CVS? >>>> >>>> Can I run pubrules on it now or do you take care of it? >>> >>> Michael - no, the new images are not in CVS. Can you bing them in and >>> re-run pubrules, and then I'll write-up the publication request? >>> >>> (Sorry, doing about 3 publication requests today, and your a more >>> knowledageble chair than the other two!) >>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas >>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >>>> Ireland, Europe >>>> Tel. +353 91 495730 >>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> >>>>> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:12:18 +0100 (BST) >>>>> To: <bvillazon@fi.upm.es> >>>>> Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Souripriya Das >>>>> <souripriya.das@oracle.com>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org> >>>>> Subject: Re: done with the document -- just figures need to be updated >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Souri,all >>>>>> >>>>>> I updated the figures according to version 1.25, you can find them >>>>>> at: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/TriplesMap.png >>>>>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/ForeignKey.png >>>>>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/RDFTermMap.png >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a question, I'm not sure how exactly represent this >>>>>> rr:tableGraphIRI rdfs:range <Set of valid IRI references> . >>>>>> >>>>>> it is included in the figure >>>>>> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/img/TriplesMap.png >>>>>> >>>>>> Would you pls check it and let me know if it is ok? >>>>> >>>>> It looks fine to me. You could have also done it with data-types, but >>>>> otherwise it seems clear. >>>>> >>>>> Given that we have to publish this before 12 ET time today, I think >>>>> unless >>>>> there's any objections, we do the publication request. I'll wait 2 >>>>> more >>>>> hours just in case. >>>>> >>>>> cheers, >>>>> harry >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Boris >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 27/10/2010 7:50, Hausenblas, Michael wrote: >>>>>>> Souri, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Great to learn things worked out, thanks a lot! However, I'm >>>>>>> confused >>>>>>> re >>>>>>> the figures - Boris said he has done it and Richard uploaded them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you please check and confirm we are good to go ASAP? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Michael >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 12:58:39 UTC