- From: Boris Villazón Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:43:55 +0100
- To: rdB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Hi all, After a quick look at the minutes, I think you suggested sth like - the expected default mapping result as separate entry - reorganization of the test cases, sth like direct graph mapping features of the r2rml - put the db-direct pairs in the first half of the document? - In TC3, due to absence of primary key, the subject will be a bNode? - it might be better to have one kind of test cases for direct, and another kind for r2rml? Since I was out of the call, would you pls clarify the aforementioned points? Thank you in advance and regards Boris
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 18:44:29 UTC