- From: Boris Villazón Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:43:55 +0100
- To: rdB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Hi all,
After a quick look at the minutes, I think you suggested sth like
- the expected default mapping result as separate entry
- reorganization of the test cases, sth like
direct graph mapping
features of the r2rml
- put the db-direct pairs in the first half of the document?
- In TC3, due to absence of primary key, the subject will be a bNode?
- it might be better to have one kind of test cases for direct, and
another kind for r2rml?
Since I was out of the call, would you pls clarify the aforementioned
points?
Thank you in advance and regards
Boris
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 18:44:29 UTC