- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:40:15 -0800
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
That's my fault ... just keeping the pot stirred! All the best, Ashok On 11/20/2010 2:24 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > I wonder where this agenda item comes from... I guess it was triggered by my question to Michael at the SWCG call. > > I did not have anything very complicated in mind, just a question... we are talking about the possibility of translating SPARQL queries to the SQL calls on-the-fly. I was just wondering whether there was a systematic consideration whether that is possible at all if I write an R2RML or use the direct mapping; if not, under which circumstances, and whether this is something that the author of an R2RML instance can influence. I saw in the inverseExpression term in R2RML; is that enough for what I meant? > > Maybe some sort of primer text should include more information on that. > > That is all... > > Ivan > > On Nov 19, 2010, at 20:20 , Juan Sequeda wrote: > >> Hi Ivan, >> >> Per the agenda, it states: >> >> 4. Reverse Mapping >> Question from Ivan re RDF2RDB (it's not in our charter, but maybe some WG >> members plan to address this?) >> >> I'm curious about RDF2RDB. Could you expand on this. What are the use cases? Requirements? >> >> Thanks >> >> Juan Sequeda >> +1-575-SEQ-UEDA >> www.juansequeda.com > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 20 November 2010 17:42:28 UTC