- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:56:27 -0400
- To: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Cc: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
* ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> [2010-11-04 08:28-0700] > Yes, please keep working on the alt document. > Harry is with me in the room and agrees with this plan. > All the best, Ashok > > On 11/4/2010 8:23 AM, Juan Sequeda wrote: > >All > > > >On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:15 AM, ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com <mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>> wrote: > > > > Subsequent to Harry's note, Thomas and I had a chat with Eric and we agreed on > > the following plan of action: > > > > 1. Juan and Marcelo will continue to work on a document based on Eric's draft and send it to the WG before Nov. 9 > > > > > >On "a document" So that means that we will keep going forward with the separate /alt document that we are working on? > > > >Now I am completely confused. Harry sent an email 30 min ago about merging the documents. > > > >Please clarify > > > > 2. On the Nov 9 call the WG will decide whether to take this document as a base document > > to create the FPWD. > > 3. We realize that changes may need to be made to this document to get it to FPWD. > > 4. In the case that the WG does not agree to use the Juan/Marcelo document as the basis > > for the FPWD, the WG will consider a document produced by Eric. Eric's document will not > > include the changes proposed by Juan/Marcelo. understood. apologies if I stepped on toes; I intended only to resolve redundancies and merge the documents. > > -- All the best, Ashok > > > > -- -ericP
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 15:56:57 UTC