Re: Default Mapping and tomorrow's telcon

> Michael and all,
>
> First we need to get comments back from everybody soon about section 2.
>
> We then need to have some discussion about 2.3.3 and 2.3.4.
>
> After that, we need to talk about the formal notation. I would like to
> propose the following:
>
> Lets have all three notations: set, datalog and relational alegrbra.
>
> Therefore everybody can be happy.

I'm happy with three notations out in the FPWD, and then we can ask for
feedback about what notation is preferred. Ideally, in these sort of
cases, I'd like to have consensus (or even a vote) from implementers
decide. But in order to make that decision fair and transparent, we need
*one* document with all three notations lined up next to each other after
each english explanation.

     cheers,
         harry


>
> If things go smoothly, I think we can have this out in 2 weeks.
>
> Juan Sequeda
> +1-575-SEQ-UEDA
> www.juansequeda.com
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Michael Hausenblas <
> michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Marcelo, Eric, Juan,
>>
>> This looks very promising, great job!
>>
>> When can we schedule this for FPWD?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>      Michael
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas
>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>> Ireland, Europe
>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>
>>
>>
>> > From: Marcelo Arenas <marcelo.arenas1@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 22:57:37 -0300
>> > To: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
>> > Cc: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, RDB2RDF WG
>> > <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
>> > Subject: Re: Default Mapping and tomorrow's telcon
>> > Resent-From: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
>> > Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 01:58:07 +0000
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Marcelo Arenas
>> > <marcelo.arenas1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:08 AM, ashok malhotra
>> >> <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote:
>> >>> Juan, Marcelo:
>> >>> Here are a couple suggestions on your document
>> >>> - Add the first example from Section 2 of Eric's document to the
>> bottom
>> of
>> >>> the section called
>> >>> The output of the default mapping.
>> >>> - Discuss single-column primary keys vs. multi-column primary keys
>> and
>> how
>> >>> multi-column pk's are
>> >>> handled
>> >>> - As and when you can, fill in the sections at the bottom of the
>> document.
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for your comments. We are currently working on a new
>> version
>> >> of the document in the W3C format, that will integrate Eric's
>> proposal
>> >> with our proposal and will include a discussion about single-column
>> >> primary keys (foreign keys) versus multi-column primary keys (foreign
>> >> keys).
>> >>
>> >
>> > Dear All,
>> >
>> > There is a new version of the document defining the semantics of the
>> > default mapping in the W3C format:
>> >
>> > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directGraph/alt
>> >
>> > Please read Section 2 (Transformation Description) in this new
>> > document, where we have integrated Eric's proposal with our proposal
>> > with Juan.
>> >
>> > Comments are very welcome!
>> >
>> > All the best,
>> >
>> > Marcelo
>> >
>>
>>
>

Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 10:48:01 UTC