Re: Comments on Requirements and Usecase Document

> Can we please all try to avoid using proprietary document formats for WG
> correspondence?

+1

I would have expected that people when joining a W3C activity would make
make themselves familiar with the W3C mailing list netiquette, esp. re
attachments. If this has not been the case, yet, I suggest people have a
look at [1]. 

Cheers,
      Michael

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/03/email_attachment_formats.html

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
> Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 08:57:53 -0400
> To: "Ezzat, Ahmed" <Ahmed.Ezzat@hp.com>
> Cc: "ashok.malhotra@oracle.com" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, RDB2RDF WG
> <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Comments on Requirements and Usecase Document
> Resent-From: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 12:58:28 +0000
> 
> Can we please all try to avoid using proprietary document formats for WG
> correspondence?
> 
> thanks,
> Lee
> 
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Ezzat, Ahmed <Ahmed.Ezzat@hp.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Attached are my comments.
>> 
>> 
>> Regarding next week, I will know Monday if I will be able to join Tuesday
>> the conference call.
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Ahmed
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-rdb2rdf-wg-request@w3.org [
>> mailto:public-rdb2rdf-wg-request@w3.org <public-rdb2rdf-wg-request@w3.org>]
>> On Behalf Of ashok malhotra
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 3:44 PM
>> To: RDB2RDF WG
>> Subject: Comments on Requirements and Usecase Document
>> 
>> See attached Word file.
>> --
>> All the best, Ashok
>> 
>>

Received on Sunday, 23 May 2010 09:42:23 UTC