- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:45:44 +0100
- To: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>, <fpriyatna@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
(forwarding to the correct address) Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html ------ Forwarded Message From: Freddy Priyatna <fpriyatna@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:54:37 +0200 To: RDB2RDF XG list <public-xg-rdb2rdf@w3.org> Subject: Question on Use Cases & Requirements for Mapping Relational Databases to RDF Resent-From: RDB2RDF XG list <public-xg-rdb2rdf@w3.org> Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:55:07 +0000 Dear All, I've just read the document "Use Cases & Requirements for Mapping Relational Databases to RDF". There is a question I would like to ask regarding the figure on page 4. The figure depicts that the SPARQL is posed on the RDF graph generated by RDB2RDF. The impression I got is, the RDF graph has to be generated first as a result of RDB2RDF before we can pose the SPARQL query. However, there is a possibility that the RDF graph is the result of RDB2RDF + SPARQL. Is this accommodated in the requirement? I am missing something here? Sorry if this issue has been discussed before. Regards Freddy ------ End of Forwarded Message
Received on Friday, 18 June 2010 15:46:21 UTC