- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:45:44 +0100
- To: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>, <fpriyatna@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
(forwarding to the correct address)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html
------ Forwarded Message
From: Freddy Priyatna <fpriyatna@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:54:37 +0200
To: RDB2RDF XG list <public-xg-rdb2rdf@w3.org>
Subject: Question on Use Cases & Requirements for Mapping Relational
Databases to RDF
Resent-From: RDB2RDF XG list <public-xg-rdb2rdf@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:55:07 +0000
Dear All,
I've just read the document "Use Cases & Requirements for Mapping
Relational Databases to RDF". There is a question I would like to ask
regarding the figure on page 4.
The figure depicts that the SPARQL is posed on the RDF graph generated
by RDB2RDF. The impression I got is, the RDF graph has to be generated
first as a result of RDB2RDF before we can pose the SPARQL query.
However, there is a possibility that the RDF graph is the result of
RDB2RDF + SPARQL. Is this accommodated in the requirement?
I am missing something here? Sorry if this issue has been discussed before.
Regards
Freddy
------ End of Forwarded Message
Received on Friday, 18 June 2010 15:46:21 UTC