Re: Question on Use Cases & Requirements for Mapping Relational Databases to RDF from Juan Sequeda on 2010-06-18 (public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from June 2010)

From: Juan Sequeda <jsequeda@cs.utexas.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:00:28 -0500
To: Freddy Priyatna <fpriyatna@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Cc: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <AANLkTinKLQUhS71MdBgPGBPBbd2lu6PaOJa-r2SA3E-v@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Freddy

Please use the following email: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org

Forwarding this to the WG mailing list, because it was sent to the old XG
mailing list

Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com


On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Freddy Priyatna <
fpriyatna@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> I've just read the document "Use Cases & Requirements for Mapping
> Relational Databases to RDF". There is a question I would like to ask
> regarding the figure on page 4.
>
> The figure depicts that the SPARQL is posed on the RDF graph generated by
> RDB2RDF. The impression I got is, the RDF graph has to be generated first as
> a result of RDB2RDF before we can pose the SPARQL query. However, there is a
> possibility that the RDF graph is the result of RDB2RDF + SPARQL. Is this
> accommodated in the requirement?
>
> I am missing something here? Sorry if this issue has been discussed before.
>
> Regards
>
> Freddy
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 18 June 2010 14:00:57 UTC