- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:39:37 -0800
- To: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
- CC: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
I thought you meant to ask what OKKAM does. In general, there are many different requirements on creating URIs for linked data. I think R2RML should allow users to write a function to generate URIs All the best, Ashok Juan Sequeda wrote: > not necessarily, doesn't D2R use the primary key value? film/1.. > film/2 ... etc? > > Is it important to discuss how URIs for RDB2RDF should be created? > Does it even matter? > > Juan Sequeda, Ph.D Student > Dept. of Computer Sciences > The University of Texas at Austin > www.juansequeda.com <http://www.juansequeda.com> > www.semanticwebaustin.org <http://www.semanticwebaustin.org> > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 7:10 PM, ashok malhotra > <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com <mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>> wrote: > > Hi Juan: > IIRC, the identifier would include neither the name of the movie > nor the name of the actress. > The end of the URL would be a UUID, i.e a 128-bit number. > All the best, Ashok > > > Juan Sequeda wrote: > > Michael and all, > > I have a question about reusable identifiers. > > If I have my movie rental company relational database and I > want to expose it all as Linked Data. What should be the > identifier for "Breakfast at Tiffany's?" > > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Breakfast_at_Tiffany%27s_%28film%29 > http://data.linkedmdb.org/resource/film/71 > okkam identifier for Breakfast at Tiffany's (if it exists) > > or should it be a > http://myrentalstore.com/resource/film/123 owl:samesAs > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Breakfast_at_Tiffany%27s_%28film%29 > > Audrey Hepburn, can be considered a well known entity with > URIs in dbpedia, freebase, etc. We know that Audrey Hepburn > acted in Breakfast at Tiffany's. So should I have my own URI > for the movie and reuse an identifier for Audrey Hepburn? > > I agree that we need to offer the possibility in the language > to reuse the identifiers, I'm just wondering what is the use case. > > > > Juan Sequeda, Ph.D Student > Dept. of Computer Sciences > The University of Texas at Austin > www.juansequeda.com <http://www.juansequeda.com> > <http://www.juansequeda.com> > www.semanticwebaustin.org <http://www.semanticwebaustin.org> > <http://www.semanticwebaustin.org> > > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Michael Hausenblas > <michael.hausenblas@deri.org > <mailto:michael.hausenblas@deri.org> > <mailto:michael.hausenblas@deri.org > <mailto:michael.hausenblas@deri.org>>> wrote: > > > All, > > I've put my initial thoughts re the Linked Data aspects of > R2RML > on our Wiki > [1]. Please read, review & comment (preferably in the Wiki; > saves > us all > time ;). > > Note that this will be the main discussion point for our > upcoming > telco on > 2010-01-19. > > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects > > -- > Dr. Michael Hausenblas > LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre > DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute > NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway > Ireland, Europe > Tel. +353 91 495730 > http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ > http://sw-app.org/about.html > > > > >
Received on Friday, 15 January 2010 00:42:38 UTC