- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:37:24 +0100
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
Eric, Thanks - looking good to me. Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html > From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> > Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:40:34 -0400 > To: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: The Role of the Ontology > Resent-From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> > Resent-To: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:46:18 -0400 > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> wrote: >> The issue of the ontology has never been discussed and I think this is >> tremendously important! >> When we are mapping our RDB to RDF, are we considering an >> >> existing domain ontology (FOAF, SIOC, etc) >> a putative ontology (automatically generating the ontology from the >> schema/DDL) >> a federated ontology: combining different ontologies > > I've added > [[ > This graph can be used when it is desired to let the database > structure determine the effective ontology of the RDF view. > ]] > to <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/#isomorphic> and > [[ > It is good Semantic Web practice to use shared ontologies. Using > popular ontologies, or even ontologies which represent information in > multiple domain databases, usually requires transformations > [GraphTransform] to the direct graph. > ]] > to <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/#non-isomorphic>. > > I've also added an extensive editorial note outlining the requirement > space implied by the later "requirement": > [[ > There are many types of graph transformation, representable by SQL > views, SPARQL CONSTRUCTs, Horn logic, etc. The RDB2RDF workiing group > would like feedback to decide if, for instance, the transformation > expressed by RIF Basic Logic Dialect are appropriate. Use case > contributions to this document will help determine the exact > expressivity required. > ]] > >> I'm sure that we don't need to go into deep detail for the use cases, but >> I'm sure that this topic needs to be present. >> Juan Sequeda >> +1-575-SEQ-UEDA >> www.juansequeda.com >> > > > > -- > -ericP > office: +1.617.258.5741 > mobile: +1.617.599.3509 >
Received on Friday, 23 April 2010 13:37:59 UTC