Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Mapping Relational Databases to RDF

On 21.04.2010 8:28, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> I think we were looking for a way to distinguish the data-dependent
> features from the schema-dependent features. Any suggestions for
> wording? (maybe "data-dependent", "schema-dependent"?)

I don't understand how the clustering of the requirements you made is 
related to data and schema.
The currently labeled functional requirements appear to be *core* 
requirements with regard to the mapping, while the currently labeled 
non-functional ones could maybe better named *auxiliary* requirements.
Such a distinction from my point of view could make sense.

Sören

Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 07:55:54 UTC