- From: Sören Auer <soeren.auer@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:11:51 +0200
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- CC: Sören Auer <auer@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 21.04.2010 5:15, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > Eric and I discussed all your requirements and integrated your input [1]. > Please note that we introduced a new subsection 3.2 called 'Non-Functional > Requirements' and moved some of your proposed requirements, there, as they > seem not to directly address/effect the R2RML, but rather are for > convenience, or otherwise desirable. As I understand the distinction between functional and non-functional from the software engineering point of view: it is not about importance or desireability, but whether a requirement introduces new functionality or is related to quantitative measures such as performance, scalability etc. In that light all my requirements are functional. Sören
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:18:56 UTC