Re: Draft of Use Case document on Wiki (as promised)

Eric,

As of right now, we will make no more edits on [1]. I believe this is the
start (we only present at the moment 3 use cases).

Where do you think the editorial flow is weird? We took out the expressivity
part at the moment because it seems that it is subsumed in R2ML Application
Use Case Requirements (in our previous email we explain why).

Therefore, if it is just for nice html visualization purposes of the wiki,
go for it. We are not doing more edits today

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements
Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com


On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:

> * Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> [2010-04-19 16:32+0100]
> >
> > Great work, Juan!
> >
> > We (Eric and I) take over for now (consider the Wiki stable for the
> moment)
> > in order to compile a version for tomorrow's meeting at [1].
>
> Stable? The entire contents of the wiki changed 15 minutes ago,
> deleting the use case which was the basis for many of the
> illustrations of the expressivity requirements (this makes the
> editorial flow pretty weird). Michael and I assumed it was stable
> last night and started migrating this AM.
>
>
> > Cheers,
> >       Michael
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Michael Hausenblas
> > LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> > DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> > NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> > Ireland, Europe
> > Tel. +353 91 495730
> > http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> > http://sw-app.org/about.html
> >
> >
> >
> > > From: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:29:17 -0500
> > > To: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> > > Subject: Draft of Use Case document on Wiki (as promised)
> > > Resent-From: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> > > Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:29:52 +0000
> > >
> > > Hi Everybody
> > >
> > > You can find an updated version of the Use Case document here [1]. This
> is
> > > the original page that we have been adding all the use cases. I created
> a
> > > Draft of Use Cases page here [2].
> > >
> > > Therefore, we should be focusing on [1]. I still need to add some of
> the
> > > UML, DDL, etc.
> > >
> > > I'm following the example that Michael once gave out from the RDFa Use
> Case
> > > document [3] where they originally show HTML (before) and then show
> > > HTML+RDFa (after). I think this is something that we should do in this
> > > document. However, I guess this may be up for discussion.
> > >
> > > Looking forward to your comments
> > >
> > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements
> > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Draft_of_Use_Cases
> > > <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements>[3]
> > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-scenarios/#use-case-1
> > >
> > > Juan Sequeda
> > > +1-575-SEQ-UEDA
> > > www.juansequeda.com
> >
> >
>
> --
> -ericP
>