Re: R2RML ontology bug? constant shortcut property definition not according to spec. from Richard Cyganiak on 2016-02-24 (public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org from February 2016)

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:30:23 +0000
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: "Martin G. Skjæveland" <martige@ifi.uio.no>, public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <DDAFFF5F-B921-4B51-B014-B47C1FDC8C44@cyganiak.de>

Ivan,

> On 24 Feb 2016, at 13:52, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>>>> I can confirm that the domain definitions for rr:subject, rr:predicate, rr:object and rr:graph in https://www.w3.org/ns/r2rml.ttl <https://www.w3.org/ns/r2rml.ttl> do not match (or even resemble) the specification.
…
>> Is it still known how the document was produced? There are HTML+RDFa, Turtle and RDF/XML variants (and possibly others?). Which one is the master copy? What toolchain was used to produce the others?
> 
> I am not sure, but I suspect the HTML+RDFa is the master. I usually generate all the other variants before pushing them up, via CVS, to the server

The HTML+RDFa looks auto-generated to me. I may be wrong.

Richard

Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2016 17:30:46 UTC