Michael: The minutes say: ivan: RDF WG discussion of standardizing skolemized blank nodes ... similar issue in RDB2RDF WG Does this propose that blank nodes be identified by a generated handle? I think the RDB2RDF WG would prefer generated URIs All the best, Ashok On 3/9/2011 7:11 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > All, > I'd like to ask for feedback on an issue we have in the RDB2RDF mapping language [1] (background: this is triggered by a discussion we had today in the Semantic Web Coordination Group meeting. For details see the discussions referenced within the issue and also the most recent thread [2]. > I encourage discussion on public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org and would also like to ask RDB2RDF WG members to participate, here. > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/9 > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Mar/0027.html > -- > Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow > LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre > DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute > NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway > Ireland, Europe > Tel. +353 91 495730 > http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ > http://sw-app.org/about.html > >
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 15:28:29 UTC