- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:11:04 +0100
- To: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
- Cc: public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 14:06 +0200, Simon Reinhardt wrote: > "The mapping language SHOULD have a human-readable syntax as well as > XML and RDF representations of the syntax for purposes of discovery > and machine generation." > > In my opinion this is way too many representations (given that RDF > itself has dozens of syntaxes already) which will be a huge burden on > the implementors. If the RDF syntax were the only normative one, a simplified XML syntax could perhaps be published as a Note with accompanying GRDDL transform. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2009 14:11:52 UTC