Re: Pull Requests 178 & 175, and the Explainer Doc

Dear Phil and all,

> @Seabass - please can you review the PR. Based on last week's
> conversation I hope this addresses the issue that you raised? If so,
> please can you indicate this and, in the absence of any further
> comment from anyone, the editors can merge the PR which should close
> Issue 176 (https://github.com/w3c/rdf-canon/issues/176)

I would like to thank everyone for responding to the concerns I raised
regarding the choice of hash algorithms for internal disambiguation of
blank nodes. I found the discussion very useful and am pleased with the
direction that we are taking this. Phil, please do consider me to be in
full support of the decisions that Gregg created pull requests on the
repository to reflect.

Tomorrow I will be setting off for a longish trip to Germany, so I will
probably be unavailable for most of the RDF Dataset Canonicalization and
Hash WG discussions until mid-November.

I look forward to resuming my participation next month!

Best wishes,

Sebastian

Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2023 14:11:38 UTC