Re: AW: RAX Position Paper

Hi all,

Felix Sasaki <felix@sasakiatcf.com> on 19 July 2017 20:51:
> "About the contents...we should probably add some content because at this moment it is quite general...the problem that I can see is that if we start adding approaches or technologies, then the paper would  automatically grow in size...while if we try to keep it simple and just add a few, then it would be unfair for the technologies that we don't mention.."
> 
> We still have space for about two paragaphs to takle this issue, but I have no good solution how to address this.

I passed over the whole paper, leaving some comments for you where I couldn't solve problems myself.

As we did already have some high-level conclusions about XSLT, the main topic on which we have done actual work, why not include them into the paper.

But to make this possible I had to shorten in other places.  Mainly by rephrasing and reformatting, not by removing ideas.  The paper didn't have the right format; now it has.  (One LNCS page is really small.)  Now it's still slightly too long, but I'm still in favour of at least having _one_ concrete contribution in the paper, other than just giving a high-level overview of the group's motivation and organisation. I (or you) might be able to come up with further ideas for shortening, or, if not, we could still remove the XSLT details.

Cheers,

Christoph
 
-- 
Dr. Christoph Lange
Fraunhofer IAIS: head of Enterprise Information Systems department
+49 2241 14-2428 (redirects to mobile); room B3-216
Universität Bonn: Smart Data Analytics, senior researcher
+49 228 73-4603; Römerstraße 164, Room A209
Further contacts (Skype etc.):  http://langec.wordpress.com/about

Received on Thursday, 20 July 2017 01:12:59 UTC