Hello Christian and Christopher,
I am happy to contribute as well. Someone has to provide a first draft and
others fill in. Who would like to make a start? The structure from Christian
Thesis (the one above)
Motivation (problem statements)
State of the Art
Approaches and outlook
is fine by me.
- Felix
2017-07-13 10:27 GMT+02:00 Dirschl, Christian <
Christian.Dirschl@wolterskluwer.com>:
> Dear Christoph,
>
>
>
> I am available to contribute my share.
>
> If we are a team of 3, I think we could make it.
>
> How do we split the effort. Can we use the structure I developed?
>
>
>
> Please advise.
>
>
>
> Best
>
> Christian
>
>
>
> *Von:* Lange-Bever, Christoph [mailto:Christoph.Lange-Bever@
> iais.fraunhofer.de]
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 13. Juli 2017 09:20
> *An:* Felix Sasaki <felix@sasakiatcf.com>; Axel Polleres <
> axel.polleres@wu.ac.at>; Dirschl, Christian <Christian.Dirschl@
> wolterskluwer.com>
> *Cc:* public-rax@w3.org
> *Betreff:* RE: AW: RAX Position Paper
>
>
>
> Dear Christian, dear all,
>
> well, maybe there are resources to get the two-pager done by 20th. Felix
> would be available, I would as well (from tomorrow afternoon), if you were
> available you would even be able to represent one sector of industry. How
> much substantial details from industry do we expect on 2 pages anyway?
> Shouldn't we just draft something and ask our busy industry colleagues for
> some last minute input?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christoph
>
> --
> Christoph Lange(-Bever)
> Fraunhofer IAIS
> http://langec.wordpress.com/about
> Sent from a mobile device; please excuse my brevity.
>