- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 20:39:13 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=30119 --- Comment #7 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- Perhaps we need some process on this. I'm reluctant to cause implementations to fail a test when they implement the spec as published; I would think that a test that relies on an erratum being implemented should be explicitly flagged as such, and the dependency should be isolated to a very focussed test for that erratum. Implementors will have different policies for implementing errata; some may want to wait for the next major release of a product, or for the errata to be integrated into a new spec edition. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 19 June 2017 20:39:20 UTC