- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 20:03:49 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=30153 --- Comment #6 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- (In reply to Andrew Coleman from comment #5) > Abel, do you want to see an editorial fix to be made as a result of this > discussion, or are you happy to close this bug? Hi Andy, I am not sure I understand. If we are planning on an erratum some day, I would prefer to take this up to remove the ambiguity. If not, I can "live with it" :). With other RECs I have even seen spelling errors corrected through errata, I don't know what our threshold is for (1) creating/publishing an erratum, or (2) inclusion in an erratum. It's probably good to have an internal draft lying around somewhere, since such internal drafts are already publicly accessible, even if we never end up going through the publication process, at least there's a place people can look if they are confused or wondering whether a bug was already reported / dealt with. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2017 20:04:18 UTC