- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:47:31 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29752 --- Comment #2 from Martin Honnen <martin.honnen@gmx.de> --- (In reply to Michael Kay from comment #1) > I'm inclined though to use the new XPath 3.1 tokenize#1 > > <xsl:accumulator-rule match="text()" > select="$value + count(tokenize(.))"/> > > which gives the correct answer 14 (whether or not we strip whitespace text > nodes) without making the example a lot more complicated. That looks much better than the previous approaches using tokenize(., '\W+'). It is still easily possible to construct input samples like <p>He asked:"Does it work?"</p> where the analyze-string count on \w+ sequences would work better but I agree the examples on accumulators need to be short to demonstrate the use of accumulators and not to present more complicated attempts on word counting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 30 September 2016 11:47:44 UTC