W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2016

[Bug 29863] [FO31] Is there a constructor function for xs:numeric?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 21:33:41 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-29863-523-cUfCzi5KWN@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29863

Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
The WG agreed that a constructor function exists and should be documented.

The WG also asked the editor to add a note explaining the somewhat
counter-intuitive behaviour whereby the result of xs:numeric() applied to a
string is always an xs:double irrespective of the lexical form of the argument.

The changes have been applied.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 21:33:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:58:02 UTC