- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 07:24:29 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29814 Bug ID: 29814 Summary: [xslt30] Use of XPath comments Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Candidate Recommendation Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSLT 3.0 Assignee: mike@saxonica.com Reporter: mike@saxonica.com QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org Target Milestone: --- There are a number of places where the value space of an XSLT attribute is defined by reference to XPath constructs such as ItemType, SequenceType, IntegerLiteral, NCName, or EQName. We make it fairly clear that whitespace is generally allowed around such values, but we say nothing about comments. Can I write <xsl:function name="f:goForIt (:quickly:)"> It's pretty clear that comments are allowed in multi-token constructs - expressions and patterns - and that surely must include ItemType and SequenceType unless we say anything to the contrary - but for EQName it seems much less clear. Incidentally, for package-version I think the rules are ambiguous about whitespace (as well as comments). We say Here IntegerLiteralXP30 and NCName are as defined in the XPath 3.0 grammar productions of the same name (including rules on limits). Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored; no other whitespace is allowed. That doesn't make it clear whether leading and trailing whitespace is allowed around each IntegerLiteral/NCName, or only at the start and end of the PackageVersion as a whole (the latter is intended). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 9 September 2016 07:24:39 UTC