- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 08:26:41 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29808 --- Comment #4 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- I think you are right. We use the term "unnamed package" and I read that somehow as meaning a package with a name equal to the empty string. But that cannot be right. Either the name is *absent*, or the name is (possibly?) something compiler generated. Either way, it cannot be referenced, per your explanation in comment#3. That, with your comment#2, leads me to conclude we should close this one as INVALID. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2016 08:27:09 UTC