- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:40:25 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29963 Bug ID: 29963 Summary: [FO31] Relation item type vs list types Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Candidate Recommendation Hardware: PC OS: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSLT 3.0 Assignee: mike@saxonica.com Reporter: abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org Target Milestone: --- (part of the series of issues on FO31 review) The section 1.6 on the type system does not make clear what the relation is between item and list types. In particular, the first diagram starts with item, and has xs:anyAtomicType as a descendant. The second diagram also has xs:anyAtomicType in it, with xs:anySimpleType as parent. You may deduce from this that item == xs:anySimpleType, or more indirectly, item is a parent (and therefore an instance of) list types, but I doubt that is the intent. I have to admit I am not sure how this could be drawn differently, perhaps a note that explains the relation between diagram 1 and 2 better? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 30 October 2016 15:40:32 UTC