- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:40:25 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29963
Bug ID: 29963
Summary: [FO31] Relation item type vs list types
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Candidate Recommendation
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSLT 3.0
Assignee: mike@saxonica.com
Reporter: abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl
QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Target Milestone: ---
(part of the series of issues on FO31 review)
The section 1.6 on the type system does not make clear what the relation is
between item and list types. In particular, the first diagram starts with item,
and has xs:anyAtomicType as a descendant. The second diagram also has
xs:anyAtomicType in it, with xs:anySimpleType as parent.
You may deduce from this that item == xs:anySimpleType, or more indirectly,
item is a parent (and therefore an instance of) list types, but I doubt that is
the intent.
I have to admit I am not sure how this could be drawn differently, perhaps a
note that explains the relation between diagram 1 and 2 better?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 30 October 2016 15:40:32 UTC